Man muss es sich schon vor Augen halten: Die Bilanzen der Notenbanken sind weltweit so explodiert, dass man denken könne, wir befänden uns im Krieg. Die Folgen könnten ähnlich blutig sein, meinen zwei Kommentatoren eines englischen Assetmanagers:
- Zunächst erinnern sie an eine Serie von Morden in den 1930er-Jahren an führenden Vertretern aus Wirtschaft und Politik in Japan: “The first name on their death list was Inoue Junnosuke, a former Finance Minister, an austerity advocate and former governor of the Bank of Japan (BOJ); he was shot as he visited a nursery school. The next name was Dan Takuma, head of the Mitsui Group, the Japanese Goldman Sachs; he was shot in front of his office in the fashionable Nihonbashi district. Further attacks on the BOJ and Mitsubishi Bank followed but were unsuccessful. The ‚world of cosmopolitan finance had collided with nationalist resentment.‘ The liberal elite was stunned, unable to provide answers to the social turmoil of the time; and with the establishment paralysed, the public began to sympathise with the killers’ aims.” – bto: Nein, ich halte Gewalt weder für berechtigt, noch für wünschenswert etc. Ich denke nur, es zeigt, wohin wir kommen können, wenn das geldpolitische Großexperiment, siehe Beitrag von heute Morgen, vor die Wand fährt.
- “Enter Finance Minister Takahashi Korekiyo. He placated the nationalists by championing massive deficit financing, via the BOJ, to pull Japan out of its economic morass. Japan’s economy soon embarked on a period of economic growth with stable prices, full employment and humming factories, an ‚economic nirvana.‘ Seven decades later these results were heralded a success by another central banker trying a similar trick – Ben Bernanke.” – bto: Also war die Politik des billigen Geldes damals a) Folge der politischen Lage, b) erfolgreich. Also, warum nicht?
- “Korekiyo’s plan was to fund government spending by having the BOJ directly purchase all the government-issued bonds. The hope was that, when conditions and inflation improved, the bonds would be sold back into the market. Four years later, the BOJ’s balance sheet was 90% of GDP, and the economy (and for ‚economy‘ read military) was totally dependent on government spending financed by the BOJ.” – bto: Da stehen wir nun noch nicht. Die Bilanzen der Notenbanken sind zwar deutlich gewachsen, aber wir haben noch keine direkte Finanzierung von Staatsausgaben. Das kommt als Nächstes!
- “As the first modest hint of inflation arrived Korekiyo attempted to sell government bonds publicly, but the auction failed. With this failure it became clear that the bonds which had been stuffed onto the BOJ’s balance sheet could never be sold. Korekiyo’s struggle to ‘cut up the credit card’ culminated in him suffering a similar fate to Junnosuke and being cut up in an attack of army machetes. As the BOJ’s balance sheet crossed 100% of GDP, there could be no turning back, the road to conflict had been primed by the BOJ’s swollen balance sheet and the money that had flooded into the military.” – bto: Unter Hitler passierte übrigens das Gleiche. Auch hier war die Notenbank stark in die Finanzierung der Aufrüstung involviert.
- “The current Bank of Japan’s balance sheet has now again crossed that fabled 100% of GDP and it is getting close to owning 45% of outstanding government bonds. There is no end in sight with the BOJ buying $60 billion a month of government debt. At this current pace the modern BOJ will by 2019 be the proud owner of 60% of the local bond market. There is no longer a market price for a Japanese Government Bond, it is an asset whose price is set by the BOJ. The key difference between today and the 1930s is that Japan now has an open capital account, therefore the only untethered market price is the currency. The Yen’s continued devaluation will be deep and comprehensive, while Japanese equities will continue to rise, adjusting to the currency loss.” – bto: Und es fließt nicht in Militärausgaben, sondern in allgemeine Konjunkturprogramme.
- “Central banks continue to act as the enablers to their respective governments. They provide funding that papers over the underlying social anxiety, delaying our much needed dialogue. When historians look back and see the cavalier balance sheets of the central banks they would rightly assume there was a world war going on as every central bank balance sheet is now approaching or exceeding levels not seen since 1945. However, the worrying truth is that there are no external enemies to overcome; the central bankers are only maintaining the growth trajectory that we demand.” – bto: Der “Feind” ist ja auch im Inland. Die unterfinanzierten Sozialstaaten stehen vor dem Offenbarungseid.
- “The current social contract is mired in the quicksand of global finance. It is being kept alive by the corpulent balance sheets of central banks, who do their government’s bidding so that the politicians do not have to put unpleasant choices in front of their electorates. This cowardly behaviour gives rise to slogans and sloganeers, who provide familiar but false checklists of remedies. ‚Take bank control‘… ‚America First‘… ‚One Belt, One Road‘ … ‚Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer‘ … Central banks are currently furnishing the excess credit that, in the past, has been followed by an orgy of blood.“ – bto: Wenn auch der Vergleich hinkt, ist es doch eine sehr interessante Beobachtung. Es kann nicht gut enden, die Frage ist, welches der Endspielszenarien wir erleben werden.