Reichen die Roh­stoffe aus?

Heute zitiere ich CounterPunch. Weil ich es auch nicht kannte, habe ich kurz geschaut, was das ist. Wikipedia: “CounterPunch ist ein linkes Online-Magazin. CounterPunch hat seinen Sitz in den Vereinigten Staaten und berichtet über Politik in einer Weise, die seine Herausgeber als ‘Muckraking mit radikaler Haltung’ beschreiben.”

Also zitierbar.

Im August fragte das Magazin: “Is There Enough Metal to Replace Oil?” Die kurze Antwort: “No, not even close!”


  • “(…) recent study puts a damper on the prospects of phasing out fossil fuels in favor of renewables. More to the point, a phase out of fossil fuels by mid century looks to be a nearly impossible Sisyphean task. It’s all about quantities of minerals/metals contained in Mother Earth. There aren’t enough.” – bto: Andere Studien sagen, es gäbe genug, aber die Kosten der Exploration seien zu hoch.
  • “Geological Survey Finland has done a detailed study of what’s required to phase out fossil fuels in favor of renewables, to wit: ‘The quantity of metal required to make just one generation of renewable tech units to replace fossil fuels is much larger than first thought. Current mining production of these metals is not even close to meeting demand. Current reported mineral reserves are also not enough in size.’”
  • “(…) calculations for what’s required to phase out fossil fuels uses a starting point of 2018 with 84.5% of primary energy still fossil fuel-based and less than 1% of the world’s vehicle fleet electric. Therefore, the first generation of renewable energy is only now coming on stream, meaning there will be no recycling availability of production materials for some time. Production will have to be sourced from mining.” – bto: Auch das ist klar.
  • “When presented basic information to EU analysts, it was a shock to them. (…) they had not put together the various mineral/metal data requirements to phase out fossil fuels and replaced by renewables. They assumed, using guesstimates, the metals would be available.”
  • “A key issue for the accomplishment of renewables is power storage because of the impact of wind and solar intermittency, both of which are highly intermittent. Most studies assume gas will be the buffer for intermittency. Other than using fossil fuel such as gas as a buffer, an adequate power storage system to handle intermittency will require 30 times more material than what electric vehicles require with current plans, meaning the scope is much larger than the current paradigm allows.” – bto: Wie wir wissen, ist die Alternative Wasserstoff, auch sehr energieintensiv.
  • “One factor that will influence what materials and systems are used to build out renewables is the fact that EVs require a battery that is 3.2 times the mass of the equivalent of a hydrogen fuel tank. Therefore, an analysis of EVs versus hydrogen fuel cells indicates it’ll be necessary to build out the global fleet with EVs for city traffic and hydrogen fuel cells for all long-range vehicles like semi-trailers, rails, and maritime shipping. The entire renewable build-out requires 36,000 terawatt hours to operate, meaning 586,000 new non-fossil fuel power stations of average size. The current fleet of power stations is only 46,000, meaning it’ll take 10 times the current number of power stations, yet to be built.” – bto: Zudem benötigen sie weitaus mehr Flächen als die konventionellen Kraftwerke.
  • “The new annual energy capacity of 36,007.9 terrawatt hours will supply (1) 29 million EV Buses (2) 601.3 million Commercial EV Vans (3) 695.2 million EV Passenger Cars (4) 28.9 million H2-Cell Trucks (5) 62 million EV Motorcycles (6). Hydro will also need to be expanded by 115% by 2050 and nuclear will need to double. Biomass will stay the same. It’s already at limitations. Geothermal triples.” – bto: Diese Aufzählung zeigt, dass wir einen effizienteren Weg der Energieerzeugung brauchen.
  • “The EU is using Hornsdale (the Elon Musk project with a 100-megawatt capacity in Australia) as the standard buffer system. Globally, 15,635,478 Hornsdale-type stations will need to be built across the planet and connected to the power grid system just to meet a 4-week buffer system. This is 30 times the capacity compared to the entire global vehicle fleet. Therefore the market for batteries is substantially larger than currently understood and accounted for in planning for a renewable economy.” – bto: Deshalb setzt man eben auf Wasserstoff.
  • “The International Energy Agency (IEA) released a report on how much metal is required per unit to build out a renewable economy. (…) The total metals required for one generation of technology to phase out fossil fuels is listed by Required Production followed by Known Reserves for all metals based upon tonnes, as follows:
    • Copper 4,575,523,674 vs. 880,000,000 – a serious shortfall -reserves only cover 20% of requirements.
    • Zinc 35,704,918 vs. 250,000,000 – adequate reserves.
    • Manganese 227,889,504 vs 1,500,000,000 – adequate reserves
    • Nickel 940,578,114 vs. 95,000,000 – huge shortfall – reserves 10% of requirements.
    • Lithium 944,150,293 vs. 95,000,000 = huge shortfall – reserves 10% of requirements.
    • Cobalt 218,396,990 vs. 7,600,000 – huge shortfall – reserves 3.48% of requirements.
    • Graphite 8,973,640,257 vs. 320,000,000 = huge shortfall – 3.57% reserves of requirements.
    • Silicon (metallurgical) 49,571,460 – adequate reserves
    • Silver 145,579 vs. 530,000 – adequate reserves
    • Vanadium 681,865,986 vs. 24,000,000= huge shortfall -3.52% reserves of requirement
    • Zirconium 2,614,126 vs.70, 000,000 – adequate reserves.” – bto: Was für eine Differenz! Beeindruckend.
  • “Prior to 2020- the global system mined 700 million tons of copper throughout all history. Looking forward, the same 700 million tons will need to be mined over the next 22 years, which is based upon current economic growth rates without giving consideration to what’s needed for one generation of renewables. Current reserves of copper are 880 million tons. But 4.5 billion tons of copper are required just to manufacture one generation of renewable technology. Hmm.”
  • “THE PAST – ‘An industrial ecosystem of unprecedented size and complexity, that took more than a century to build with the support of the highest calorifically dense source of cheap energy the world has ever known (oil) in abundant quantities, with easily available credit, and unlimited mineral resources.’ (Michaux)” – bto: Gut zusammengefasst.
  • “THE PRESENT – ‘We now seek to build an even more complex system with very expensive energy, a fragile finance system saturated in debt, not enough minerals, with an unprecedented number of the human population, embedded in a deteriorating environment.’ (Michaux)” – bto: Die Herausforderung ist gigantisch und deshalb wird jemand einen besseren Weg finden. Kernfusion?


“Current mineral reserves are not adequate to resource metal production to manufacture the generation of renewable energy technology, as current mining is not even close to meeting the expected demand for one generation of renewable technology.” – bto: Aber bei uns träumt man weiter. „Is There Enough Metal to Replace Oil?”, 23. August 2022